Hippokratia 2013, 17, 4: 319-321

Kotrotsiou Tz1, Exindari M1, Diza E1, Gioula G1, Melidou A1, Kaplanis K2, Malisiovas N1
1Microbiology Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 2Gynecology Department, Theagenion Anticancer Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece


Aim: This study attends to determine the prevalence and the antimicrobial susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum in asymptomatic women in Northern Greece.
Materials-Methods: A total of 347 cervical smears were divided into 5 groups according to age. Samples were cultured, Ureaplasma urealyticum isolation was confirmed by the detection of the urease gene and the antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to 9 commercially available antibiotics was determined.
Results: Fifty-six (16.13%) samples were found positive. Women >60 years old were rarely infected. Only 9 (16.07%) isolates were susceptible to all antimicrobials tested. Thirteen isolates were resistant and 34 intermediately resistant to ciprofloxacin, two resistant and 29 intermediately resistant to ofloxacin, three intermediately resistant to macrolides, while all were susceptible to tetracyclines.
Conclusions: In Northern Greece, 16.13% of asymptomatic women seem to be carriers of Ureaplasma urealyticum mostly in reproductive ages. Almost no resistance to macrolides and tetracyclines has been noticed, while most of the isolates present resistance or moderate sensitivity to quinolones.

Read PDF

Key words: Ureaplasma urealyticum, prevalence, women, asymptomatic, susceptibility, Northern Greece

Corresponding author: Assist. Professor Maria Exindari, Microbiology Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece, tel: +302310999031, fax: +302310999140, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


Ureaplasma urealyticum belongs to the family Mycoplasmataceae, the smallest among free-living cellular microorganisms in nature. The bacterium is found in the urogenital system of many healthy people1,2, while the infections caused may present various clinical features. Apart from symptomatic infections, subclinical ones or simple carriage may occur. The urogenital colonization depends on sex, age, sexual activity and hormonal status. It has been correlated to low socioeconomic levels, young ages, large number of sexual partners, African-American ethnicity and oral contraceptive use3,4. The bacterium’s pathogenic effects include obstetric, perinatal, urological and paediatric infections. Adults may urogenital infections, such as non-gonoccocal urethritis (NGU), chronic prostatitis and epididymitis in males, and vaginitis and cervicitis in females4-6.

In 2002 Ureaplasma urealyticum was divided into two species, U. parvum (biotype 1) und U. urealyticum (biotype 2)7. U. parvum is more often detected in vaginal and cervical samples4,6,8-10. B-lactam antibiotics cannot be used for U. urealyticum since they lack the cell wall structure. The antibiotics of choice are the ones interfering to protein synthesis (macrolides and tetracyclines) and to active nucleic acid composition (quinolones)11. U. urealyticum resistance has been globally observed at all three categories of antibiotics, macrolides, tetracyclines and quinolones6,12-16, which raises concerns and increases the importance of ureaplasma surveillance. Similar findings have been reported in Greece17,18, although U. urealyticum resistance is not well investigated at the moment.

Therefore, the present study investigates the prevalence of U. urealyticum in asymptomatic women in Northern Greece and to the susceptibility of the microorganism to various antimicrobial agents.

Materials and Methods

A total of 347 cervical smears were collected from asymptomatic women who visited Theagenion anticancer hospital of Thessaloniki for annual Papanikolaou test control as a part of the prevention screening programme.

The women selected were 20 to 70 years old, residents of Northern Greece, with no restriction as to race or nationality, reporting no genital system symptoms and no antimicrobial treatment during the previous month for any reason. The samples were divided into 5 age groups, 20-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60 and ≥61 years old, which included 42, 57, 109, 107 and 32 samples respectively.

The samples were obtained with cotton swab from the cervical transitional zone after the removal of excess vaginal and cervical secretions. The swab was immersed in the specific preservation and transport medium for mycoplasmas (Mycoplasma U-A Broth, Bioprepare, Greece).

Small quantities of all broths were inoculated on A7 Agar plates (Mycotest Agar, Bioprepare, Greece) and incubated for 48 hours in 37οC with 10% CO2. Ureaplasma isolation was confirmed by plate microscopy.

Positive results obtained by traditional techniques were confirmed by molecular methods. After DNA extraction (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), a Real-time PCR was designed for the detection of urease gene (ureA, ureB, part of ureC) in all the positive samples. The amplified urease gene consists of 429 bases. Primers were used for the detection according to Blanchard et al19 and Beeton et al6.

The strains of U. urealyticum spp. were then distinguished to U. urealyticum and U. parvum with Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), (Sacace Biotechnologies Srl, Italy) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The phenotypical resistance control was carried out with a broadly used, standardized method which checks the sensitivity to 9 antibiotics in two concentrations (Mycoplasma IST 2, Biomerieux, France).

The method is based on the colour alteration as the pH increases due to the effect of the microorganism on a liquid culture medium. The antibiotics used were doxycycline, josamysin, ofloxacin, erythromycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, clarithromycin and pristinamycin. Moderate sensitivity is indicated if the colour change is observed only in the lowest antibiotic concentration whereas resistance is reported when the change is observed in both antibiotic concentrations.

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


Regarding the prevalence, U. urealyticum spp was detected in high concentration (>104) in 56 (16.1%) out of 347 cultured samples. All positive samples were confirmed by Real-time PCR. The isolates were further classificated into species: 54 of them belonged to U. parvum and 2 to U. urealyticum.

Of the 42 samples belonging to the 20-30 years age group, 8 (19.0%) were positive; of the 57 samples belonging to the 31-40 years age group, 12 (21.1%) were positive; of the 109 samples belonging to the 41-50 years age group, 21 (19.3%) were positive; of the 107 samples belonging to the 51-60 years age group, 14 (13.1%) were positive; while of the 32 samples belonging to the ≥61 years age group, only 1 (3.1%) was positive (Figure 1). The pair-wise statistical comparison among all age groups revealed statistically significant differences only for the ≥61 years old (comparing to 20-30 years p=0.0379, to 31-40 years p=0.0175, to 41-50 years p=0.0263 and to the total p=0.0488). All other pair combinations presented p>0.05.

Regarding the susceptibility to antibiotics, only 9 (16.07%) of the 56 isolated strains were sensitive to all 9 antibiotics.

The examination of susceptibility to quinolones indicated that 13 (23.21%) strains were resistant and 34 (60.07%) were moderately sensitive to ciprofloxacin, while resistance to ofloxacin was observed in 2 (3.5%) strains and moderate sensitivity in 29 (51.79%).

Regarding macrolides susceptibility, 1 (1.7%) strain proved moderately sensitive to azithromycin, 1 (1.7%) moderately sensitive to clarithromycin and 1 (1.7%) to erythromycin.

All strains were sensitive to tetracyclines.

The age distribution of women with resistant and moderately sensitive strains is shown at Table 1.


The present randomized sampling among the clinically healthy female population of N. Greece proved that 16.13% of these asymptomatic women were carriers of Ureaplasma urealyticum spp. in high concentrations, as healthy individuals who include the microorganism in their vaginal normal flora and/or as possible future patients. The existence of Ureaplasma spp has been generally reported in 40-80% of clinically healthy women in the USA4, but only 8.9% in a sample of very young women in Norway20. Moreover, recent studies on non-asymptomatic women all over the world presented various results, such as 20.1% of infertile women in the USA21, 46.52% of women with genital infectious diseases in China22, 20.8 % of reproductive-age women with vulvovaginitis in Athens18.

The majority of U. urealyticum carriers have been found among women of reproductive age, fact which indicates the important role of hormone profile and sexual activity in the prevalence of the microorganism. The role of the hormonal status regarding the presence of Ureaplasma spp. in the female genital tract has already been documented since it has been detected in vaginal flora in 40% of sexually inactive, in 67% of sexually active women of reproductive age and in 25% of postmenopausal women23. The intensity of sexual activity has also been already associated with the presence of Ureaplasma spp4.

Regarding species, 96.4% of the positive samples belong to U. parvum and only 3.6% to U. urealyticum, a common finding according to the international bibliography. In Australia the distinction of human ureaplasmas resulted in U. parvum 87% versus U. urealyticum 19%8. In Germany U. parvum biovar was found in 81% of the women examined, while 6% of them were co-infected with both biovars9. Similarly in U. K. isolated ureaplasmas belonged to U. parvum and to U. urealyticum in a proportion of 80% and 20% respectively6.

Differences observed at the phenotypical drug resistance among groups of antimicrobials seem to be correlated with their use rates. Quinolones, following their continuously raising use for plenty of infections, present high percentages of resistance (3.5-60% depending on the antibiotic) in contrast to macrolides and tetracyclines towards which resistance was found to be very low or completely absent. Tetracyclines seem to be much more effective against U. urealyticum as the examined strains are all sensitive to them. In agreement to our results, Kechagia et al have found the resistance to the categories of antibiotic drugs that are prescribed as protocol treatment in Greece, 2008, as follows: tetracyclines 0-4.5%, macrolides 6.3-33.3% and quinolones 18-77.5%17. Baka et al have also reported 1-3% to tetracyclines, 12.2%-18.1% to macrolides, while 86.1% and 53.7% to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin respectively18. Researches carried out in various countries indicate resistance percentages at similar levels. Strains isolated in France were 2.2% resistant to tetracyclines16. In China, resistance to quinolones has increased since 2000 and overtakes 50%, while resistance to erythomycin has been reduced from 63.9% to 20% since 2000, which is attributed to the widespread use of quinolones14. According to Duffy et al, in U.S.A., ureaplasma isolates showed increased resistance to all fluoroquinolones13. It seems that quinolone abuse leads to resistance14, mainly through mutations to the enzymes targets or throughout an altered membrane permeability of the microorganism6. However, strains isolated in U.K. presented equal and very low (1/61) resistance to each one of the three antimicrobial groups mentioned above6.

Concluding, Ureaplasma urealyticum in asymptomatic women is quite frequent. Its increasing resistance to quinolones raises concerns about detaining the problem but also motivates future research in various levels and directions.

Conflict of Interest

There are no financial or other relationships that might lead to a conflict of interests about this work.


1. Prescott L, Harley J, Klein D. Microbiology, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005: 892.
2. Murray P, Rosenthal K, Pfaller M. Medical Microbiology, 4th ed., Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, Pensylvania, 2005: 397.
3. Woods GL, Walker DH. Chlamydial, Rickettsial, and Mycoplasmal Infections. McPherson RA, Pincus MR. Henry’s Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods. 21st ed., Saunders Elsevier Inc, 2007: 1010-1015.
4. Waites KB, Katz B, Schelonka RL. Mycoplasmas and Ureaplasmas as Neonatal Pathogens. Clin Microb Rev. 2005; 18: 757-789.
5. Glass JI, Lefkowitz EJ, Glass JS, Heiner CR, Chen EY, Cassell GH. The complete sequence of the mucosal pathogen Ureaplasma urealyticum. Nature. 2000; 407: 757-762.
6. Beeton ML, Chalker VJ, Maxwell NC, Kotecha S, Spiller OB. Concurrent titration and determination of antibiotic resistance in Ureaplasma species with identification of novel point mutations in genes associated with resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53: 2020-2027.
7. Kong F, Gilbert GL. Postgenomic taxonomy of human ureaplasmas -- a case study based on multiple gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004; 54: 1815-1821.
8. Kong F, Ma Z, James G, Gordon S, Gilbert GL. Species identification and subtyping of Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum using PCR-based assays J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38: 1175-1179.
9. Abele-Horn M, Wolff C, Dressel P, Pfaff F, Zimmermann A. Association of Ureaplasma urealyticum biovars with clinical outcome for neonates, obstetric patients, and gynecological patients with pelvic inflammatory disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1997; 35: 1199-1202.
10. Pereyre S, Métifiot M, Cazanave C, Renaudin H, Charron A, Bébéar C, et al. Characterisation of in vitro-selected mutants of Ureaplasma parvum resistant to macrolides and related antibiotics. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007; 29: 207-211.
11. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Treatment Guidelines 2006, Diseases Characterized by Urethritis and Cervicitis, available at: www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/2006/urethritis-and-cervicitis.htm, , accessed January 26, 2010.
12. Bébéar CM, Renaudin H, Charron A, Clerc M, Pereyre S, Bébéar C. DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV mutations in clinical isolates of Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis resistant to fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47: 3323-3325.
13. Duffy L, Glass J, Hall G, Avery R, Rackley R, Peterson S, et al. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Ureaplasma parvum in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44: 1590-1591.
14. Xie X, Zhang J. Trends in the rates of resistance of Ureaplasma urealyticum to antibiotics and identification of the mutation site in the quinolone resistance-determining region in Chinese patients. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006; 259: 181-186.
15. Dongya M, Wencheng X, Xiaobo M, Lu W. Transition mutations in 23S rRNA account for acquired resistance to macrolides in Ureaplasma urealyticum. Microb Drug Resist. 2008; 14: 183-186.
16. Dégrange S, Renaudin H, Charron A, Bébéar C, Bébéar CM. Tetracycline resistance in Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis: Prevalence in Bordeaux, France, from 1999 to 2002 and description of two tet(M)-positive isolates of M. hominis susceptible to tetracyclines. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008; 52: 742-744.
17. Kechagia N, Bersimis S, Chatzipanagiotou S. Incidence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of genital mycoplasmas in outpatient women with clinical vaginitis in Athens, Greece. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008; 62: 122-125.
18. Baka S, Tsirmpa I, Tsouma I, Logothetis E, Kouskouni E. Increased quinolone-resistant Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in reproductive-age women with vulvovaginitis. 22nd European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID)  2012, London.
19. Blanchard A, Hentschel J, Duffy L, Baldus K, Cassell GH. Detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum by polymerase chain reaction in the urogenital tract of adults, in amniotic fluid, and the respiratory tract of newborns. Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 17 Suppl 1: S148-S153.
20. Jensen AJ, Kleveland CR, Moghaddam A, Haaheim H, Hjelmevoll SO, Skogen V. Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium and Ureaplasma urealyticum among students in northern Norway. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013; 27: 91-96.
21. Imudia AN, Detti L, Puscheck EE, Yelian FD, Diamond MP. The prevalence of ureaplasma urealyticum, mycoplasma hominis, chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae infections, and the rubella status of patients undergoing an initial infertility evaluation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008; 25: 43-46.
22. Zhu C, Liu J, Ling Y, Dong C, Wu T, Yu X, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in Chinese women with genital infectious diseases. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2012; 78: 406-407.
23. Viscardi RM. Ureaplasma species: role in diseases of prematurity. Clin Perinatol. 2010; 37: 393-409.