LETTER

Hippokratia 2015, 19(4):376-376

Papoutsis D1, Haefner HK2
1
Department of Maternity, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom, 2 University of Michigan Center for Vulvar Diseases, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America

 

Read PDF

Key words:  Varicosities, labor, delivery

Corresponding author: Papoutsis D, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom, tel: +4401952641222, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Dear Editor,

Α 34-year-old G1P0 patient presented to the University of Michigan health system with extensive left vulvar varicosities in pregnancy (Figure 1). A vulvar ultrasound at 36 weeks of gestation demonstrated a large-sized mass with adjacent dilated vessels in the left labium majus. The patient stated that the varicosities were increasingly painful. To avoid any unpredictable tearing and lacerations during vaginal birth and possibly life-threatening bleeding from this site, the patient consented to a cesarean section which was performed at 39+4 weeks of gestation. Following delivery, the pain was alleviated, but the vulvar varicosities did not regress. The patient was subsequently referred to the vascular surgeons who recommended a pelvic venogram with possible embolization of any incompetent vessels. However, the patient declined further treatment and was discharged from hospital care and follow-up. 



Figure 1: Severe left-sided vulvar varicosities at 36-weeks of gestation.

Vulvar varicose veins occur in approximately 4% of women and are rarely seen outside pregnancy1. The pathogenesis of vulvar varicosities is mainly valvular dysfunction, but the fundamental etiology is unclear2. Risk factors associated with vulvar varicose veins include increasing age, standing for long periods, genetics, and increased levels of estrogens and progesterone3.

To date, there is no consensus on the optimal mode of delivery. There is no clear evidence that favors cesarean section delivery over vaginal birth in the rare case of severe vulvar varicosities2. The main concern is that the vulvar varicose veins may cause extensive bleeding should they rupture during labor and vaginal delivery. In our case, the patient was informed about the risks of possible rupture and bleeding from the extensive vulvar varicosities and also about the risks of an operative delivery, and gave informed consent for cesarean section.

Cases of successful vaginal birth have been described in the presence of huge vulvar varicose veins. However, cases of massive bleeding from ruptured vulvar varicosities following normal delivery have also been reported2. Since no evidence base exists regarding the safest delivery method, each patient should be considered on an individual basis, and informed consent should be obtained.  

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Bell D, Kane PB, Liang S, Conway C, Tornos C. Vulvar varices: an uncommon entity in surgical pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2007; 26: 99-101.
2. Furuta N, Kondoh E, Yamada S, Kawasaki K, Ueda A, Mogami H, et al. Vaginal delivery in the presence of huge vulvar varicosities: a case report with MRI evaluation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 167: 127-131.
3. Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol. 2005; 15: 175-184.